How do you implement a good profanity filter?

03/29/2020 01:00:01

Many of us need to deal with user input, search queries, and situations where the input text can potentially contain profanity or undesirable language. Oftentimes this needs to be filtered out.

Where can one find a good list of swear words in various languages and dialects?

Are there APIs available to sources that contain good lists? Or maybe an API that simply says "yes this is clean" or "no this is dirty" with some parameters?

What are some good methods for catching folks trying to trick the system, like a$$, azz, or a55?

Bonus points if you offer solutions for PHP. :)

Edit: Response to answers that say simply avoid the programmatic issue:

I think there is a place for this kind of filter when, for instance, a user can use public image search to find pictures that get added to a sensitive community pool. If they can search for "penis", then they will likely get many pictures of, yep. If we don't want pictures of that, then preventing the word as a search term is a good gatekeeper, though admittedly not a foolproof method. Getting the list of words in the first place is the real question.

So I'm really referring to a way to figure out of a single token is dirty or not and then simply disallow it. I'd not bother preventing a sentiment like the totally hilarious "long necked giraffe" reference. Nothing you can do there. :)

Verified Answer (173 Votes)

11/08/2008 01:21:12

Obscenity Filters: Bad Idea, or Incredibly Intercoursing Bad Idea?

Also, one can't forget The Untold History of Toontown's SpeedChat, where even using a "safe-word whitelist" resulted in a 14 year old quickly circumventing it with: "I want to stick my long-necked Giraffe up your fluffy white bunny."

Bottom line: Ultimately, for any system that you implement, there is absolutely no substitute for human review (whether peer or otherwise). Feel free to implement a rudimentary tool to get rid of the drive-by's, but for the determined troll, you absolutely must have a non-algorithm-based approach.

A system that removes anonymity and introduces accountability (something that Stack Overflow does well) is helpful also, particularly in order to help combat John Gabriel's G.I.F.T.

You also asked where you can get profanity lists to get you started -- one open-source project to check out is Dansguardian -- check out the source code for their default profanity lists. There is also an additional third party Phrase List that you can download for the proxy that may be a helpful gleaning point for you.

Edit in response the question edit: Thanks for the clarification on what you're trying to do. In that case, if you're just trying to do a simple word filter, there are two ways you can do it. One is to create a single long regexp with all of the banned phrases that you want to censor, and merely do a regex find/replace with it. A regex like:

$filterRegex = "(boogers|snot|poop|shucks|argh)"

and run it on your input string using preg_match() to wholesale test for a hit,

or preg_replace() to blank them out.

You can also load those functions up with arrays rather than a single long regex, and for long word lists, it may be more manageable. See the preg_replace() for some good examples as to how arrays can be used flexibly.

For additional PHP programming examples, see this page for a somewhat advanced generic class for word filtering that *'s out the center letters from censored words, and this previous Stack Overflow question that also has a PHP example (the main valuable part in there is the SQL-based filtered word approach -- the leet-speak compensator can be dispensed with if you find it unnecessary).

You also added: "Getting the list of words in the first place is the real question." -- in addition to some of the previous Dansgaurdian links, you may find this handy .zip of 458 words to be helpful.

173

Answer #2 (42 Votes)

11/19/2012 09:27:21

Whilst I know that this question is fairly old, but it's a commonly occurring question...

There is both a reason and a distinct need for profanity filters (see Wikipedia entry here), but they often fall short of being 100% accurate for very distinct reasons; Context and accuracy.

It depends (wholly) on what you're trying to achieve - at it's most basic, you're probably trying to cover the "seven dirty words" and then some... Some businesses need to filter the most basic of profanity: basic swear words, URLs or even personal information and so on, but others need to prevent illicit account naming (Xbox live is an example) or far more...

User generated content doesn't just contain potential swear words, it can also contain offensive references to:

  • Sexual acts
  • Sexual orientation
  • Religion
  • Ethnicity
  • Etc...

And potentially, in multiple languages. Shutterstock has developed basic dirty-words lists in 10 languages to date, but it's still basic and very much oriented towards their 'tagging' needs. There are a number of other lists available on the web.

I agree with the accepted answer that it's not a defined science and as language is a continually evolving challenge but one where a 90% catch rate is better than 0%. It depends purely on your goals - what you're trying to achieve, the level of support you have and how important it is to remove profanities of different types.

In building a filter, you need to consider the following elements and how they relate to your project:

  • Words/phrases
  • Acronyms (FOAD/LMFAO etc)
  • False positives (words, places and names like 'mishit', 'scunthorpe' and 'titsworth')
  • URLs (porn sites are an obvious target)
  • Personal information (email, address, phone etc - if applicable)
  • Language choice (usually English by default)
  • Moderation (how, if at all, you can interact with user generated content and what you can do with it)

You can easily build a profanity filter that captures 90%+ of profanities, but you'll never hit 100%. It's just not possible. The closer you want to get to 100%, the harder it becomes... Having built a complex profanity engine in the past that dealt with more than 500K realtime messages per day, I'd offer the following advice:

A basic filter would involve:

  • Building a list of applicable profanities
  • Developing a method of dealing with derivations of profanities

A moderately complex filer would involve, (In addition to a basic filter):

  • Using complex pattern matching to deal with extended derivations (using advanced regex)
  • Dealing with Leetspeak (l33t)
  • Dealing with false positives

A complex filter would involve a number of the following (In addition to a moderate filter):

  • Whitelists and blacklists
  • Naive bayesian inference filtering of phrases/terms
  • Soundex functions (where a word sounds like another)
  • Levenshtein distance
  • Stemming
  • Human moderators to help guide a filtering engine to learn by example or where matches aren't accurate enough without guidance (a self/continually-improving system)
  • Perhaps some form of AI engine
42

Answer #3 (27 Votes)

11/08/2008 01:26:00

I don't know of any good libraries for this, but whatever you do, make sure that you err in the direction of letting stuff through. I've dealt with systems that wouldn't allow me to use "mpassell" as a username, because it contains "ass" as a substring. That's a great way to alienate users!

27
3
Hack Hex uses Stack Exchance API by the Stack Exchange Inc. to scrape questions/answers under Creative Commons license.